2014 Horror

Jessabelle – Review

 

Jessabelle_3

 

Directed by Kevin Greutert (the man behind Saw VI, Saw 3D, and a directorial contributor to the cult film Donnie Darko), Jessabelle tells the story of a woman who returns to her childhood home and comes face-to-face with a distressed spirit who has been awaiting her return, and has no intention of letting her escape. Rotten Tomatoes awards it a stinky 25%, IMDB a measly 5.4/10, and AV Club a modest B-. It’s mixed feedback across the board. So, where exactly does Jessabelle sit on our film review radar? Is this a hair-raising horror or a boring blunder? Read on…

The film begins with our female protagonist, Jessie (played by Sarah Snook), who’s packing up and moving in with her boyfriend along with an unborn plus one. However, en-route to their new home, their futures are shattered when they’re involved in a high-speed side-on collision. Her boyfriend and unborn baby are killed in the crash, and Jessie is left temporarily paralysed. Despite Jessie having an aunt who she gets on perfectly well with, Jessie is “forced” to move back into her childhood home with her estranged father Leon (David Andrews). (Personally, if we were in this position, we’d probably just go and chill with the friendly aunt but, hey, where’s the film opportunity in that?)

When she moves in the supernatural presences and eerie goings on start taking place from the get-go, but things really start going downhill when she discovers and plays some old VHS tapes under the bed. There’s something we really like about the inclusion of VHS tapes in a horror film; the graininess and discolouration, the fuzzy snow static, the jumpy quality caused by poor tracking, oh, and nothing gives us the creeps more than an unlabelled one – who knows what’s been recorded on that? The worn VHS effect shines through nicely in the footage and generously adds to the sense of mystery surrounding the suspicious activity in the house.

The first tape she watches shows her dearly departed mother (Joelle Carter) giving her a good-natured ‘beyond-the-grave’ tarot reading which leads to her disclosing that an evil presence is in the house. Each recording provides a more accurate reading (stating that the presence is an evil demon), and the mother’s reactions to this evil spirit gradually begin to escalate with each tape. Leon catches Jessie watching these tapes, and eventually decides to set these (and accidentally himself) on fire. Safety first, kids! Don’t cover video tapes in gasoline and light a match immediately after.

Stop, drop 'n' roll!

Stop, drop ‘n’ roll! Stop, drop ‘n’ roll!

Fast forward to Leon’s funeral, and Jessie bumps into her old friend *cough ex boyfriend cough* Preston at the service (played by Marc Webber). Jessie and Preston have a catch-up over dinner, with Preston disclosing that he is married whilst the two stare longingly into each others eyes. Preston is unhappy about her being in the house on her own, and offers for her to stay the night with him and his wife. At one point Preston has Jessie in his arms and they engage in intense eye contact for an awkward 30+ seconds. Err…hang on! What happened to the story about the evil spirit that haunts Jessie? The impression that we both had at this point is that all elements of peril and horror take a distant backseat whilst the story focuses too heavily on the boring relationship between Preston and Jessie. This isn’t Eastenders, Kev. Nobody cares about this storyline!

With Preston becoming more and more involved in the mystery of Jessabelle, they both watch the tapes together (one of which is discovered hidden behind the house wall after a fight sequence with Jessie and spirit Jessabelle), and the storyline takes an interesting turn when both Jessie and Preston discover an ancient burial ground across the bayou. A tiny headstone with ‘Jessebelle’ crudely marked into it sits amongst an array of voodoo paraphernalia, and Preston digs up the grave to find the bones of a small child. The police become involved and take the bones away for examination. Apart from another discovery of a similar site used to bury ‘Moses’ (who previously told Jessie’s mother that Jessabelle was a demon), the voodoo magic themes are left very much unexplored. A shame really, as this could’ve given the story a slightly different edge instead of taking the cookie cutter ‘demonic spirit’ route.

Preston is eventually attacked by Jessabelle when he takes Jessie back to his home. Jessie learns that the buried child was a black girl murdered after birth, leading her to believe that she needs to be saved. Jessie tries to do this by speaking to Jessabelle directly, but instead discovers another VHS tape on the coffee table which shows a recording of Jessie’s mother cursing a white baby and shooting herself.

"Goin' down d'bayou, Goin' down d'bayou!"

“Goin’ down d’bayou, Goin’ down d’bayou!”

Her mother’s spirit then appears to her and reveals that the unwanted presence is Jessie herself (not Jessabelle, OMG #plottwist!) Turns out ol’ Mrs Jessie had had a sordid affair with Moses and, in a fit of rage, Jessie’s father had discovered this and killed the baby and moses using Jessie as a cover-up. Moses’ spirit appears before Jessie and, working in tandem with the apparition of Jessie’s mother, they wheel her into the bayou where she sinks into it’s murky depths. Jessabelle is there too, and uses this opportunity to enter Jessie. The film is wrapped up with Jessie leaving the bayou in Preston’s arms and, as the police sheriff asks if Jessie is alright, her contorted face turns to answer him and splutters a final corny line – “It’s Jessabelle”. Cue credits.

A complement sandwich

A complement sandwich

OK enough synopsis talk, let’s tell you what we thought about this film. Ever heard of the ‘compliment’ sandwich‘? We’ll start off with the good, talk about the areas that need improvement, and finish on a positive note.

The acting is pretty decent all-around from start to finish, but it’s Sarah Snook’s character that stands head and shoulders from the rest of the cast. We have to be honest, before watching the film we didn’t know who she was, but I thought she played the leading role pretty well. As we both lazily slunk into bed after a hard day’s work, I asked Laura for her thoughts on this. “I just thought she was rubbish”, she told me, “a bit like a poor man’s Emma Stone”.

Difference of opinions aside, our main gripe is that her performance is shrouded by an incredibly busy storyline. We’ve barely covered the film’s synopsis earlier in this post – A LOT happens in the film’s hour and a half duration. It has it’s little moments and some interesting themes are presented to the viewer but, due to the sheer volume of these ideas hastily weaved into the script, none of them are really explored to their full potential. It makes the film very fast paced and, like the London Underground’s Central Line during peak time in Zone 1, far too much is packed into a small space.

The story comes with it’s share of unanswered questions and unusual scenarios which make no sense and lend nothing to an already muddled plot. Notable examples include:

  • Preston’s wife being absolutely fine with his ex-partner sleeping in their marital home. Laura and I aren’t married (well…not just yet), but if she brought her ex-boyfriend back and said “Hey babe, you remember my ex right? Do you mind if he sleeps on the couch as I don’t want him to be alone?” Personally, I’d respond by grabbing the guy by the scruff of his neck and comically throwing him out the door and onto his backside.
  • Mr and Mrs Jessie obtaining a white baby so soon after Mr Jessie murders the first child? Last time I checked, you couldn’t naturally create a new child with such a quick turnaround. Either they have stolen one from another family at this point, or they have convenient access to some-sort of artificial baby-making factory. “Quick, grab any one off the ‘finished product’ conveyor belt and let’s crack on with this voodoo magic tomfoolery.”
  • The physiotherapist who decides it’s a brilliant idea to leave a paralysed woman in a bathtub on her own. “Here you go, Jessie. I ran you a bath! Just in case you get hungry I’ve popped some bread in the toaster and perched it on the edge of the bath just by the taps, there’s a hairdryer plugged in too so you can dry your hair before you get out of the water, and I’m going to switch the lights off on my way out so you can save on your energy bill. See you in 6 hours!”
  • We acknowledge that Jessie’s mobility is affected due to her accident, but what exactly is stopping her from leaving the house at any time? She isn’t completely housebound, she hasn’t been locked in against her will, she’s old enough to make her own decisions, and there’s certainly no point in her staying there when her dad pops his clogs. “Just discovered the house is haunted and I’m really lonely and miserable here, regardless of this I will never leave”
  • Coincidences. Lots and lots of coincidences, which only serve as a half-assed attempt to patch up holes and crudely tie up loose ends. Examples of these include Preston randomly showing up at her father’s funeral despite him not being made aware of the location/date/time of the event (let alone the fact that Jessie’s father is now dead), Jessie and Preston discovering Moses’ little burial plot on their way to see him (“Let’s go see Moses. Wait, stop everything – he’s buried over there.”), and a group of men showing up from nowhere to beat Preston senseless when they visit the aforementioned burial site

On a positive note – the deep-south Louisiana scenes serve as a lovely visual backdrop throughout the film. The camera work captures these chilling images with good detail, particularly with the bayou’s haunting mist contrasting with the rich summer colours from the surrounding trees and foliage. The scenery effectively adds to the sense of mystery and complements Jessie’s discomforting loneliness and isolation from society.

So, overall, Jessabelle is a mixed bag of pros and cons. To summarise, it’s a run of the mill supernatural horror which has it’s little sparkles of interest but suffers badly due to the plot being like a Rube Goldberg machine. Casual horror fans might enjoy it but, for the connoisseurs among us, there’s much better out there.

The Lampy-metre

Novices might be hit harder with post-scare insomnia from the jumpy appearances of Jessabelle in spirit form (add an extra 3 to the below score if you don’t watch a lot of horror), but we’re immune to this basic tactic now! Apart from a 3am visit to answer nature’s call, we slept like babies.

lampy3-10

Ouija – Review

SuLGfRVZ41

Take one Ouija board, add five teenagers, a mental patient and some tried ‘n’ tested horror film tactics. The end result? The appropriately titled “Ouija”, one of 2014’s Hollywood blockbuster horrors directed by Stiles White, who is better known for his special effects work on The Sixth Sense. To summarise, the film is like a roller coaster ride. You sit yourself down prepared for thrills and shocks, and it delivers. Afterwards, you get off the ride and that’s it – fin. There’s no point going on the ride again, as you know what’s coming…

Basically, the plot is entirely predictable. The film opens with Debbie (played by Shelly Henig) committing suicide using some fairy lights, leaving behind five grieving friends and lots of unanswered questions. The best friend, Laine (played by Olivia Cooke), drags her friends into Debbie’s house and coerces them into playing with the Ouija board (which Laine had found amongst Debbie’s possessions).

10267

(Disclaimer: there is no innocent baby Sylvester in this film)

The board is down and the five courageous teens hold the planchette. Cue the inevitable “Who’s moving it, is it you?” “Don’t look at me! She did it!” etc. etc. Eventually, enough happens so that everyone believes that Debbie is communicating with them. “Hi Friend!” 

Wait for it though – the spirit isn’t Debbie but is in-fact the mysterious ‘DZ’. Looking through the planchette, Laine sees a little girl ghost (the worst kind) with her lips sewn together, and an angry mama ghost. After unleashing the beast within, the friends begin to be killed one by one. Run of the mill deaths here include… a nasty wang to the head, more lip-sewing and a push into the pool. Laine uncovers some information, and as luck would have it, the sister of the dead ghost girl lives 5 minutes away in a mental asylum. The older woman (who is also in Insidious – horror buff?) tells Laine to unstitch DZ’s lips, allowing her to defeat ‘mother’, the evil matriarch.

"KIDS, GO TO YOUR ROOM!" - Mother

“KIDS, GO TO YOUR ROOM!” – Mother

In a slightly different twist, the old crazy woman had spun a lie for her own benefit, and it turns out that DZ was actually the evil one. Poor mum. DZ continues to wreak havoc, and the film begins to get a little stale. Nothing original, and eventually only Laine and her sister are left. Things are looking bleak for the sisters, but then angel Debbie comes and saves the day. DZ is defeated, although the film ends on a note of ambiguity – the planchette is still there in Laine’s room, and the film closes with our protagonist looking through it. Had she learnt nothing?

The film is nothing new – there is nothing particularly unique about it. Although the jumpy scenes are very well done and certainly had the desired affect on us, the plot was weak and the acting erred on the side of wooden. This is definitely one to watch in the cinema, because that is where you will get the full effect. Don’t bother buying it on DVD/watching it on your laptop – take away the jumps and you are left with a lifeless, plot-holed waste of 90 minutes.

The Lampy-Metre

Just in case you’re new here, each film we review is rated with Lampy’s. Sometimes your imagination can run wild after watching a good horror; your mind will play tricks, you might be scared, you may imagine that zombie-vampire-monsters are patiently waiting at foot of your cosy bed ready to snatch you away. In these circumstances, Lampy’s dazzling halo of light will send them running for the hills and far away. The more terror you experience, the more Lampy’s you’ll need to sleep well.

Needless to say that, after this film, Laura and I had a wonderful night’s sleep in the pitch black darkness – dreaming of candy raindrops, fields full of colourful daisies and unicorns barfing rainbows. No scares here!

lampy3-10

The Babadook…

“A rumbling sound then three sharp knocks
Ba BA-ba DOOK! DOOK! DOOK!
That’s when you’ll know that he’s around…
You’ll see him if you look.”

images

Critically acclaimed by all, a firm-favourite at the Sun Dance festival and with a (current) 95% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, the Babadook had some big boots to fill. Time Out New York said “there goes your good night’s sleep…”, but did the Babadook-dook-dook keep us awake at night?

The film opens with the untimely death of Oskar, Amelia’s husband, and we are shown immediately that Samuel (the boy, played by Noah Wiseman) is anything but normal. Hard to love, clingy and downright unnerving (not to mention weird-looking), one can immediately see that although Amelia is a kind and warm person – she works as a nurse in a retirement home – she has no emotional bond with her son.

Brandishing a home-brewed micro-catapault (at times the booby traps set up by Sam reminded us of the Home Alone series, albeit slightly more sinister) the 6 year old embarks on a series of antagonising events which culminate in his expulsion from school, and this only serves to further drive a wedge between him and his Mother. The reason behind his strange (and incredibly annoying) behaviour? The Babadook.

After a mysterious, unlabelled book arrives in Sam’s bedroom, Amelia and Sam are both understandably shocked by the disturbing contents of the oh-so creepy (but nicely illustrated) story. The creepy illustrations expand into the special effects… the ‘cartoon’ theme is present throughout the entire production. In other films this would have jarred (and basically looked off), but in this instance it perfectly complements both the style and story. A prime example is when the Babadook zips across the bedroom ceiling whilst Amelia watches in sheer terror, in what Chris describes as a ‘road runner-ish’ manner. Jerky and crudely animated and by no means perfect, but ideal in this setting.

Illustration

Amelia and Sam find themselves almost entirely shunned from society (apart from the sweet-hearted elderly neighbour) and, along with their dog, they all become isolated within their home. Despite ripping up the book in a bid to get rid of the presence, the book soon returns fully-repaired to her doorstep, with some chilling new additions. Scenes depict Amelia killing the dog, Sam and herself. At this point, things really start to spiral out of control and take a turn for the worst. Essie Davis portrays Amelia’s descent into madness with an almost chilling accuracy. She battles seeing the Babadook impersonate the late Oskar, and this illustrates the entire point of the film. This is not a film with jumpy moments strung together with a flimsy plot, but this is a film that explores something far more dark. It is a psychological terror, and one which explores some very interesting, and possibly controversial, themes.

We found ourselves simultaneously sympathising and fearing her. We can’t commend her performance highly enough – without sounding excessively sycophantic, Essie Davis is a complete babe. Well played, Australia.

fic-spau

The official flag of Australia (in homage of Essie)

The slowly-paced tension and fear crash together in a violent crescendo, where the Babadook’s predictions seem to have come to fruition and Amelia has finally become the instrument for the inevitable chaos that ensues. Dog-murders and child-strangling aside , Davis’ portrayal is graphic. Incredible. The entire film’s success is based on her performance. One particular scene reminded us of the pantry scene from our favourite classic – The Shining – and Davis’ character evokes the madness that Nicholson had done so well before her. Coming from Laura, The Shining’s biggest fan, this is high praise indeed. The Babadook is Jennifer Kent’s directoral debut, and she has set the bar high. This is not a film that ends when you walk out of the theatre – thought-provoking, chilling and downright scary.

The film ends on a refreshing note – everything is not perfect, and there isn’t a ‘happily ever after’. After all, you can’t get rid of the Babadook…

The Lampy-metre
(the scale of how many lamps you will need on to sleep after watching)

lampy8-10

Film Facts:

  • Directed by: Jennifer Kent
  • Running time: 94 minutes

If you liked this, you should check out: